Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. Mass Test on Singularity: Tuesday, 18th October @ 17:00 UTC - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Matar Ronin wrote: It would be nice to man the defenses of an engineering complex, but they are going to be automatic correct. No direct control like a POS gunner. They will work exactly the same way as Citadels - no automatic defense, so...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2016.10.18 09:43:25
|
2. I have a question for CCP - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Literally answered 2 threads from the top of this forum
- by CynoNet Two - at 2016.03.31 09:28:12
|
3. Standup Pitchfork I's at the ready... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
:siren: crisis averted :siren: CCP Nullarbor [4:01 PM] and it is supposed to just be warp scrambler that you canGÇÖt use while invulnerable maybe the tractor too since that can potentially affect being able to warp off
- by CynoNet Two - at 2016.03.30 15:15:25
|
4. Standup Pitchfork I's at the ready... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Quote: [11:42:26] Rodent Jr > CCP Claymore is it intentional that some citadel weapons (missiles, warp scrams) can't be used while the structure is invulnerable? [11:42:46] CCP Claymore > Rodent Jr yes, it is intentional, it should be...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2016.03.30 13:27:18
|
5. Apostle (And other Faux) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Triage modules have a "Remote Repair Impedance Bonus" of -99.9999 % So yes you can use remote reps, but each cycle will repair less than 1hp at a time.
- by CynoNet Two - at 2016.03.29 09:03:34
|
6. Citadels are now on Singularity - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
It would be really helpful if the larger citadels launched their fighters from a central location. On an XL it currently takes several minutes to even get them at the same point, let alone engage a target.
- by CynoNet Two - at 2016.03.25 22:37:09
|
7. Citadels are now on Singularity - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
How come these have been de-listed from the market? Standup Fighter Damage Amplifier I
- by CynoNet Two - at 2016.03.25 22:17:36
|
8. Citadels are now on Singularity - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Thalesia wrote: any news on Supercapital production restrictions`? is it possible in lowsec with a L or XL citadel post patch? No manufacturing will be possible with Citadels on initial release. More structure types will follow in future a...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2016.03.24 16:33:46
|
9. Citadels are now on Singularity - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
helana Tsero wrote: Questions / Problems with citadels. Corp theft. Currently a corp member with access can empty a corp hanger and put it all into their personal SMA/CHA. Directors have no idea who took what and where it went. Solution - need...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2016.03.24 13:38:43
|
10. Doom's day's on station again - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
TEACHER HE KEEPS PULLING MY HAIR MAKE HIM STOP
- by CynoNet Two - at 2016.03.23 15:56:07
|
11. Citadels are now on Singularity - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Eli Stan wrote: Would it be possible to allow on SISI (or even TQ) to set the vulnerability window to be larger than the minimum time? To test shooting Citadels, we have only a small time period to do so. I'd like to set the vulnerability windo...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2016.03.23 15:01:18
|
12. Citadels are now on Singularity - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: CCP any chance we can get this hanger to also include capitals and not just supers us WH pilots would like a change of scenery every now and then to and Christ dreads are bigger than supers lore wise wouldn't they also ...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2016.03.23 13:58:42
|
13. Citadels are now on Singularity - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Torgeir Hekard wrote: Okay, so citadels can haz fighters. Then what's the relationship between those citadel fighters and player skills? Are fighter stats affected by the skills of the one controlling them? Are fighter skills required to use ...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2016.03.23 11:05:31
|
14. Citadels are now on Singularity - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Couple of points: 1) You can launch mobile depots (and probably other structures) when controlling a citadel 2) Is it intentional that there is currently no way to find friendly Citadels aside from corp bookmarks or probing? I would have expecte...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2016.03.21 08:47:36
|
15. Sticky:[Crius] Starbase feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Maratega wrote: I know this is not related to industry so close, but one of the most bad thing with the pos system for me now, onlineing many defensive modules like 20-30 modules with 2 min timer, is serious pain. Need reduced online time for ...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2014.06.14 14:38:00
|
16. Singularity: Requests for account reactivation - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Push my button please~
- by CynoNet Two - at 2014.06.12 08:44:00
|
17. Why your Titan fix will fail horribly - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Sorry, but I'm gonna Goon-sperg in your thread. Fully agree with your assessment of the situation. The core of the problem lies deep in the current signature / targeting / tracking mechanics, and there is no solution that allows Titans to keep us...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2012.03.19 15:22:00
|
18. Titan on sisi - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Spazibo wrote: Just curious, perhaps that ship could be usefull for testing. I love how 'testing' is the universal code for '**** around and shoot people' and no one even questions it anymore.
- by CynoNet Two - at 2012.02.21 21:20:00
|
19. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Capital Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
DurrHurrDurr wrote: Hi. The current Raiden. turret-fit Titans have an average tracking of 0.02. The Pandemic Legion turret-fit Titans are similar. To give everyone a basline; the GSF/CFC Alphafleet Maelstrom has a tracking of 0.01 and the sta...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2012.01.18 11:40:00
|
20. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Capital Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Soon Shin wrote: Capital Shield Transporters have had their cpu fitting decreased significantly: Data from Sisi: Capital Murky Shield Screen Transmitter I cpu: 157.0 => 126.0 Capital Shield Transporter I cpu: 175.0 => 140.0 I don't fl...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2012.01.08 16:59:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |